Transparency monitoring is a key element in building confidence in carbon crops. Users want to know if they can trust the data, and trust the data provider to be key. But there are still significant obstacles in realizing data transparency, such as number politicization, the diversity of data collection methods that do not fit the definition, scope, accuracy and uncertainty.
Without clear guidance, data can be interpreted in different ways for different purposes. Comparisons between data sets also provide space for error and doubt.
When examining these issues through climate change lenses, cost becomes a major obstacle. However, researcher and panelist Julia Naima noted that the costs could be spread across several institutions that play a role in monitoring. While Böttcher states that the popularity of the data set will make it more cost-effective.
MONITORING MONITORING
With all the issues that exist, is it really true that transparency of monitoring is beneficial? The panel on the forum firmly replied, yes.
"For me, the important thing is to have more data users. This reduces costs, which is important to ensure data sustainability and keep data free for other users, "Böttcher said.
Enceel
Residencesia
Simbwox
Qudanil
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Radaedan Blog
Published:
2018-02-13T23:04:00+07:00
Title:data can be interpreted in different
Rating:
5 On
22 reviews